Drift Protocol

DeFi has reached its most dangerous moment: the real vulnerabilities are not in the code

In April 2026, the DeFi sector experienced multiple attacks exploiting non-code vulnerabilities, resulting in losses exceeding $625 million. Attackers utilized administrator private keys, cross-chain bridge validators, and social engineering tactics, revealing that DeFi security issues lie not in the code but in operations and mental models. The industry needs to reassess the definition of decentralization, emphasizing operational security and transparency. In the future, protocols must disclose operational leverage to ensure user awareness and establish insurable operational risk models.

DeFiDrift ProtocolKelpDAOcross-chain bridgesocial engineeringprivate key

DeFi 到了最危险的时候:真正的漏洞不在代码里

2026 年 4 月,DeFi 领域遭遇多起非代码漏洞攻击,损失超 6.25 亿美元。攻击者利用管理员私钥、跨链桥验证者和社会工程等手段,揭示了 DeFi 安全问题不在代码,而在运营和心智模型。行业需重新审视去中心化的定义,强调运营安全和透明度。未来,协议需公开运营杠杆,确保用户知情,并建立可承保的运营风险模型。

DeFiDrift ProtocolKelpDAO跨链桥社会工程私钥

DeFi最危险时刻:真正的漏洞不在代码,而在运营与信任模型

2026年4月DeFi遭遇多起非代码漏洞攻击,损失超6.25亿美元。攻击者利用管理员私钥、跨链桥验证者和社会工程学,暴露出去中心化金融真正的安全问题不在代码,而在运营与心智模型。行业需重新审视去中心化定义,强调运营安全与透明度,协议必须披露运营杠杆与信任假设,建立可承保的运营风险模型。

DeFiDrift ProtocolKelpDAO跨链桥社会工程学私钥